| What
pleases you about the way your story turned out? Are there any ways in
which it fell short of your original goals?
I
am most pleased by the speed, flow, and emotion of the language. The topic
is intense, I brainstormed it intensely--and that intensity comes through
for me every time I reread this piece. The only goal I had when I fixed
on this topic was to see where the word "fat" would lead me. So, I can't
say the essay falls short in any way because I was led to places (pictures,
feelings, realizations) I had never experienced before.
How
did your essay develop, both in your initial thinking about it and in
the revision process? What happened in writing that you didn't expect
would happen?
I
read Margaret Atwood's essay "The Female Body" and knew I wanted to write
something like that: a loaded topic handled with fast, clever writing
in separate, fact-and-telling-detail-filled sections. I came home from
eating at the mall one day, wrote most of the first scene, and thought
I had a subject. I researched fat in the human body, with special inspiration
coming from a photographic guide to dissecting cadavers. I looked at Lane
Bryant catalogs. I free-wrote about twenty pages, associating fat with
myself and every person, family and not, that came to mind. The focuses
of the various sections, as well as key sentences and phrases, came from
this free-writing.
If
you write in other genres (poetry, fiction, playwriting, literary criticism,
etc.), how does your experience writing in creative nonfiction depend
on or depart from your other writing?
I
write poetry as practice for my creative nonfiction. It helps me stay
with specifics, eliminate unneeded words, and expand the topic beyond
my conscious mind.
Give
some of your reflections about creative nonfiction as an emerging genre
in American literature. Where do you see it going in the next several
years, or even farther down the line?
People
read creative nonfiction and say, "The best part is, it's true." I don't
know why, but the demand for "true" stories written in rich and interesting
ways, has much to offer to meet this demand. At the same time, the commercial
market is, I think, boringly saturated with "fact" articles. I hope that
commercial editors will open their minds to creative nonfiction as the
next new hook for selling magazines.
What
are the specific literary techniques you attempt to use as a creative
nonfiction
writer? For example, do you attempt to write in scenes? Do you employ
dialogue? Do you employ specific detail? How and why?
I
think in sense-pictures so my essays are built around scenes. Often, as
in "Fat," it's a particular scene-experienced through all senses, including
the emotions-that makes me feel I have a story. I don't generally use
extended dialogue: I am more likely to use a single sentence that makes
my point. I don't think a creative nonfiction writer can do enough observing
of details; what needs to be limited is how many of those details make
it into the story. When I've brainstormed my topic to the point of having
a feel for all the directions it could take, I pull back from the scenes
and details and work on the underlying structure--the arrangement and
tension that will make the story's progress seem inevitable and irresistible
to the reader. This structure is to me the most essential-and least obvious-aspect
of writing creative nonfiction.
What
advice might you offer to young people interested in writing?
The
best thing I ever did for my development as a writer was to learn how
to draw. Drawing training, done well, teaches you to recognize the perceptual
shift that allows you to really see details and frees you from your conscious
mind. I have also learned much from analyzing the story structures of
good essay writers.

|