A few years ago, we received an essay by a talented
young writer about her affair with a high school classmate. When
I contacted her about publishing the essay in Creative Nonfiction,
I learned that she had been out of contact with the woman about
whom she had written for many years, but that through mutual friends
she had learned that the woman was now married, the mother of two
young children. “So she doesn’t know that you’ve written about your
relationship?” I asked. “No,” the writer told me. “But in the essay,
I’ve changed her name and disguised the location of our high school.
She’ll never find out.”
But what if she does? I wondered. Or what if her husband, who may
be unaware of her past life, reads the essay? Or one of her chil-dren,
sometime in the future? Or, even though names and locations have
been altered, what happens if a friend, relative or classmate recognizes
the author’s name—and puts two and two together? “What do you think
your friend would say if you got back in touch and told her that
an essay about your affair will appear in a nationally circu-lated
journal?” I asked.
“She’d be nervous, maybe defensive.”
“How would her husband feel—or her children?”
“They’d probably be hurt and angry.”
“Actually, they could sue the writer—and Creative Nonfiction,” my
attorney told me later. “What happens if the story isn’t completely
true,” he continued. “And if, by revealing this, the woman in question
loses her job? Or her husband? Litigation is entirely possible.
The plaintiff could sue the writer for slander—and Creative Nonfiction
for publishing it. “Besides,” he added, gesturing down at the manuscript
on the table in front of us, “aside from the people directly involved
or implicated in the story, who cares?”
This is the best question nonfiction writers can ask of themselves
and their work. Other than the writer and the people about whom
he or she has written, what will readers think? How will readers
relate to the essay, article, profile in question? Who will care?
This is one of several standards of evaluation by which material
is accepted for publication in Creative Nonfiction. We want the
essays we publish to strike a universal chord—establish a special
place, register an insight, moment or idea that might be shared
and appreciated by a larger readership.
At the same time, we feel that as editors and publishers we have
a responsibility to care about people other than writers—the people
about whom writers write—and whom the work we publish might involve:
parents, relatives, employers, lovers included. Over and above the
legal culpability is the moral responsibility of protecting the
unwitting victims of a writer’s need (or obsession) to tell a story.
And even if the story being told is true, we have to ask, Whose
truth?
Is this truth worth telling? And who, no matter how indirectly,
might an essay affect? Needless to say we did not accept the essay
referred to at the beginning of this editorial, although we encouraged
this writer, worked with her and eventually published another essay—her
first.
This has been a cornerstone of Creative Nonfiction’s editorial vision,
as well: To discover new voices. Megan Foss and Priscilla Hodgkins
are publishing nonfiction for the first time in this issue.The truths
being confronted in this issue of Creative Nonfiction touch an intimate
yet universal chord. Jill Carpenter and Priscilla Hodgkins delicately
and precisely document the declining days of their once vigorous
parents, while Raymond Abbott and Robert Coker Johnson discuss interesting
people—and distant friendships. Megan Foss’ truth, as seen from
behind prison bars, is discovered in the power of language and the
liberation that the reading and writing of stories can provide.
And Brian Doyle’s truth exists in a special coming of age in which
his past and his future are suddenly and gloriously blending in
a single ecstatic moment of time. Some of the essays in “The Universal
Chord” are less personal The “Truth and Consequences” of Creative
Nonfiction and more informational, such as “Shitdiggers, Mudflats
and the Worm Men of Maine” by Bill Roorbach, which is the dirtiest
story (liter-ally) we have ever published, as well as Jeff Gundy’s
“Scattering Point,” which profiles a place to which he is indelibly
linked. A.D. Coleman’s “Sea Changes” captures the profound experience
of the Staten Island Ferry. Ntozake Shange’s passion for food (“What
is it We Really Harvestin’ Here?”) and Madison Smartt Bell’s ongoing
relationship with Haiti (Sa’m Pèdi) are ideal examples of the ways
in which writers can be dramatic and factual—simultaneously.
We hope that all of the essays in this issue of Creative Nonfiction
will also make our readers care—about a place, a time of life, a
friend or loved one, about the things for which these writers share
a special devotion. We tell true stories in Creative Nonfiction,
which is what the genre of creative nonfiction is all about—but
not, when possible, at the expense of the privacy and the dignity
of other people.
|
