| Q) What
pleases you about the way your essay turned out? Are there any ways
in which you feel it fell short of your original goal?
A) I like the way
this piece manages to make something of what most people, and me
in many of my moods, would consider almost nothing -- what is more
boring than a soil map? I'm not sure I had 'original goals' in the
sense the question implies. I do have the sense that this essay
may be a bit too easy about the current and future condition of the farm
country it describes, and I hope in some future work to return to
the issues and territory that are discussed here.
Q) How did
your essay develop, both in your initial thinking about it and in
the revision process? What happened in writing it that you didn't
expect would happen?
A) The key to the
whole essay was discovering the legend 'Scattering Point Creek' written
on the map. As I played around with that idea and reality,
the other elements of the essay seemed almost to organize themselves around
it, like iron filings in a magnetic field.
Q) If you write
in other genres (poetry, fiction, playwriting,
literary criticism, etc.),
how does your experience writing in creative nonfiction depend upon or
depart from your other kinds of writing?
A) For me,
creative nonfiction differs from poetry in the space it provides to develop
ideas and themes gradually, to spin out stories, to be a little
more relaxed about what there's room and time for within the container
of the piece. I think my experience as a poet in taking good care
of words, in paying close attention to sound, rhythm,
cadence, and imagery, is invaluable in writing creative nonfiction.
Writing literary criticism helped me develop the crucial ability to really
concentrate on an object under scrutiny, whether a literary text
or a map, a waterway or a memory, to tease out and explore
the subtle contents of such objects.
Q) Give some
of your reflections about creative nonfiction as an emerging genre in
American literature. Where do you see it going in the next several
years, or even
farther down the line?
A) I think
that interest in creative nonfiction will continue, although certain
signs of backlash are beginning to show up -- especially about the sub-genre
of memoir. It may well be that, like confessionalism in poetry,
the more autobiographical and subjective strands of creative nonfiction
will face considerable skepticism. I share some of that skepticism,
but I doubt that it will, or should, keep people from writing
what they most need to write.
Q) What are
the specific literary techniques you attempt to use as a creative nonfiction
writer? For example, do you attempt to write scenes? Do you
employ dialogue? Do you employ specific detail? How,
and why?
A) Yes, all
of those. What I may be more concerned about, though,
is a kind of balance or rhythm among elements, so that the essay
doesn't get bogged down in too many research details, too much observation,
too many stagy scenes, etc. For me the goal of the essay is
to somehow push through/into/past those particulars and details into some
deeper/wider/fuller revelation, some knowledge that includes the
particulars but isn't confined to them. Technique is a means to
that end, but it's the drive to make some kind of sense of the world
that finally matters most.
Q) What advice
might you offer to young people interested in writing?
A) Read, all
that you can. Pay attention to everything. Be patient,
if possible. Recognize that while you may be able to make a living
at the craft of writing, you are unlikely to make a lot of money
on the most artful, urgent, personal work you have in you.
Try to find an honest way to make a living that leaves you some time,
energy, and ambition to do your absolute best work.

|